Quantcast
Channel: Billionaires
Viewing all 1884 articles
Browse latest View live

Even if Jeff and MacKenzie Bezos don't split his $137 billion fortune evenly, she still has a chance at becoming the world's richest woman

$
0
0

jeff bezos mackenzie bezos

MacKenzie Bezos could be poised to become the world's richest woman. 

Her husband, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, is the richest person in the world, with a fortune of $137 billion, and she'll likely be walking away with a good chunk of that after their divorce, which they announced on Wednesday.

Given that Jeff founded Amazon after they got married, MacKenzie could be entitled to half of the fortune he made from Amazon.

Jeff and MacKenzie live in Washington state, one of nine US states where everything acquired throughout the marriage — from real estate to income — is considered joint property. That means their assets could be split 50-50, unlike in the other 41 states, where a marital estate is made up of assets acquired under each spouse's name and isn't considered joint property unless both names are on the deed, as Business Insider previously reported.

Read more: MacKenzie Bezos played a big role in the founding of Amazon and drove across the country with Jeff to start it

If MacKenzie walked away from the divorce settlement with exactly half of Jeff's fortune, that would make her worth an estimated $68.5 billion — and the richest woman in the world by nearly $23 billion.

But Melisse G. Burstein, a Miami certified public accountant who specializes in accounting in high stakes litigation, said it's not likely the billionaire couple will end up splitting assets 50-50.

"Because much of Jeff Bezos' net worth is tied up in Amazon stock, it would be difficult to figure out how to get the wife 50%," Burstein told Business Insider. "I believe dividing the shares in the company could result in Jeff Bezos' control of Amazon being diluted. This would be against MacKenzie Bezos' interest as it has the potential of devaluing the company and thus devaluing the amount the individual shares are worth."

If the couple signed a prenuptial or a postnuptial agreement, that would overrule state law, Michael Stutman, a New York divorce attorney, told Business Insider.

Jeff Bezos + Mackenzie

Given the couple's vast wealth and assets, it's likely they have some sort of marital financial agreement.

The billionaire couple owns a nearly 29,000-square-foot estate outside of Seattle, Washington, as well as two neighboring Beverly Hills mansions, a Texas ranch, the largest house in Washington, DC, and a set of four condos in New York City.

The richest woman in the world

It's unknown whether Jeff and Mackenzie Bezos signed a postnuptial agreement. But MacKenzie could walk away with significantly less than 50% of the $137 billion and still become the richest woman in the world. That title is held by Francoise Bettencourt Meyers, who controls 33% of L'Oreal, the world's largest cosmetics-maker, and who is worth $45.6 billion, according to Bloomberg.

If MacKenzie comes away with even 33.4% of her husband's $137 billion fortune, she would still be worth a staggering $45.7 billion, edging out Bettencourt Meyers.

However, if Jeff and MacKenzie Bezos end up dividing their assets, the business of two billionaires getting divorced is a complicated one. Super-wealthy couples often have to deal with complex and illiquid assets, company issues, and public perception, divorce attorneys say.

For this particular couple, the question of Amazon shares complicates matters even further.

The amount MacKenzie will walk away with will be "dependent on how the divorce terms are structured and whether it is feasible for Mackenzie to acquire Amazon shares without diluting Jeff's control of the company,"Burstein said.

SEE ALSO: MacKenzie Bezos has been part of Amazon lore since before the company began, driving across the US with her husband Jeff as he wrote out his business plan in 1994

DON'T MISS: Jeff Bezos and his family own at least 6 massive properties across the US. Here's a look at the homes, from a sprawling Seattle estate to a set of historic NYC condos

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Your Christmas tree could be a big fire hazard — take these steps to stay safe


If MacKenzie Bezos gets half of Jeff Bezos' fortune, she'd become the fourth-richest person in the world — and he'd fall from the No. 1 spot

$
0
0

Jeff and Mackenzie Bezos

  • Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and his wife, MacKenzie Bezos, have said they will divorce.
  • Their separation of assets could affect the Amazon CEO's ranking among the richest people in the world.
  • If MacKenzie Bezos acquired half of Jeff Bezos' $137 billion fortune — a possible outcome of a divorce settlement — the two would be tied at No. 4 on the list with $68.5 billion each.
  • MacKenzie Bezos would easily become the richest woman in the world.

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos could find himself dropping a few spots on the list of the world's richest people soon.

And his soon-to-be ex-wife MacKenzie Bezos might rocket up the list.

Jeff Bezos sits atop the list of the world's richest people with a fortune of $137 billion. If MacKenzie Bezos acquires exactly half of that in a divorce settlement, a possible outcome, considering Washington's divorce laws and their reported lack of a prenuptial agreement, that would leave both people with $68.5 billion each.

In that scenario, Jeff Bezos would fall to the No. 4 spot on the list of the world's richest people, according to Bloomberg's real-time billionaire index. MacKenzie Bezos, who is currently unranked, would join him there.

Read more:Even if Jeff and MacKenzie Bezos don't split his $137 billion fortune evenly, she still has a chance at becoming the world's richest woman

A net worth of $68.5 billion would land the Bezoses just ahead of Amancio Ortega, a Spanish fashion retailer with a net worth of $62.2 billion, and one spot below France's Bernard Arnault, also a fashion retailer, whose net worth is $72.2 billion.

Bill Gates would regain his title as the world's richest person, a distinction he held for more than two decades, from the 1990s until Jeff Bezos overtook him last year. Gates' fortune is estimated at $93 billion.

Read more:Bill Gates is worth $95 billion and he plans to give most of it away — here's how he spends his money now, from a luxury car collection to incredible real estate

Second on the list would be investor Warren Buffett, who has a fortune of $80.8 billion.

Meanwhile, a 50-50 payout for MacKenzie Bezos would easily make her the richest woman in the world, surpassing the $45.7 billion net worth of L'Oreal heiress Francoise Bettencourt Meyers, who ranks 11th on the overall list.

Forbes releases its annual list of billionaires every March. Should her divorce be finalized by then, MacKenzie Bezos could make her debut on the list.

SEE ALSO: MacKenzie Bezos played a big role in the founding of Amazon and drove across the country with Jeff to start it

DON'T MISS: Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and his wife, MacKenzie, announce they are divorcing

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This tiny building in Wilmington, Delaware is home to 300,000 businesses

Bill Gates is worth $95 billion and he plans to give most of it away — here's how he spends his money now, from a luxury car collection to incredible real estate

$
0
0

bill gates

  • Bill Gates, the world's second-richest person, has an estimated net worth of $94.8 billion, according to Forbes.
  • While he indulges in a few luxuries, they make up only a fraction of his fortune.
  • He mainly spends his billions on charity through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and plans to give away most of his fortune.

Bill Gates, the cofounder of Microsoft, is the world's second-richest person, sitting on an estimated net worth of about $95 billion, according to Forbes.

It's hard to imagine what to do with that amount of money, but Gates knows how to make the most of it. While he has some indulgences — like a Washington estate worth $125 million, a private airplane, and a luxury-car collection — they make up only a fraction of his massive fortune.

He and wife, Melinda, previously said it's unfair they're so rich. Instead of spending billions on themselves, they often donate it to charity through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They've also pledged to give away most of their fortune through the Giving Pledge, which they launched in 2010.

See how Gates spends his billions.

SEE ALSO: We did the math to calculate exactly how much money billionaires and celebrities like Jeff Bezos and Kylie Jenner make an hour

DON'T MISS: Beyoncé is worth $355 million — see how she spends it on lavish mansions, yachting vacations, and a private jet for Jay-Z

Bill Gates, the cofounder of Microsoft, has an estimated net worth of about $95 billion, making him the world's second-richest person.

Source: Forbes



If he spent $1 million a day, it would take him more than 245 years to spend his fortune. Here's how he spends his money.

Source:Business Insider



Gates has invested in a variety of stocks and assets and launched a $1 billion investment fund, Breakthrough Energy, with 20 others.

Source: Forbes



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Meet 'Canada's Warren Buffett,' the 90-year-old billionaire who drives a Toyota pickup truck around his hometown and owns a $25 million yacht

$
0
0

Jim Pattinson

  • Jim Pattison, who has a reported net worth of $5.9 billion, has been called "Canada's Warren Buffett."
  • Like Buffett, Pattison is the third-richest person in his country, is relatively frugal, and donates heavily to philanthropy.
  • But Pattison can also be a little lavish — he owns a $25 million yacht and a fleet of jets.

Warren Buffett has plenty of billionaire peers, but it's easy to see why Jim Pattison has been dubbed this Canadian counterpart.

Known as "Canada's Warren Buffett," Pattison, 90, has a net worth of $5.9 billion, according to Forbes. It may not even graze Buffett's $8o billion net worth, but it ranks him as the third-richest man in Canada — equivalent to Buffett's seat as the third-richest man in America.

Also like Buffett, Pattinson is relatively frugal. Born during the Great Depression, he had humble beginnings that stuck with him even as he created and developed a giant conglomerate, The Jim Pattison Group, of 200-plus companies worth more than $7 billion today. He also donates heavily to philanthropy.

But that doesn't mean he doesn't indulge in a few lavish purchases. While he might have a Toyota truck parked in his garage, he also has a $25 million yacht docked not far away.

Here, see how Pattison earns and spends his billions.

SEE ALSO: Warren Buffett is the world's third-richest man — see how the notoriously frugal billionaire spends his fortune

DON'T MISS: Bill Gates is worth $95 billion and he plans to give most of it away — here's how he spends his money now, from a luxury car collection to incredible real estate

Jim Pattison, Canada's third-richest man, has a reported net worth of $5.9 billion.

Source:Forbes, Bloomberg



But Pattison wasn't always worth billions — his net worth is even more impressive considering his beginnings. He was born during the Great Depression and grew up poor, wearing hand-me-downs and living in "Vancouver's gritty east side."

Source:Bloomberg



Pattison began practicing the art of business at age 7, selling seeds door-to-door. He eventually progressed to selling newspapers and playing trumpet at church picnics.

Source:Bloomberg, Vancouver Sun



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Donald Trump is the first billionaire to serve as president of the United States — here's how he spends his $3.1 billion fortune, from his 24-karat gold-plated helicopter to the $350,000 in annual alimony to his first wife

$
0
0

donald trump president

  • Donald Trump, with a net worth of $3.1 billion according to Forbes, is the first billionaire in history to serve as president of the United States.
  • From his New York real estate to his golf clubs around the world, he rakes in millions of dollars of revenue annually.
  • Here's how Trump spends his fortune.

Donald Trump is worth an estimated $3.1 billion, according to Forbes, making him the first billionaire in US history to serve as president.

From emblazoning a private helicopter in 24-karat gold, right down to the seatbelts, to a 100-cabin yacht dubbed "Trump Princess," here's how the real-estate titan spends his fortune.

SEE ALSO: Bill Gates is worth $95 billion and he plans to give most of it away — here's how he spends his money now, from a luxury car collection to incredible real estate

DON'T MISS: From a 58-bedroom estate to a helicopter fleet, here's how the Trump family spends their billions

Forbes currently estimates Donald Trump's net worth to be $3.1 billion, a $400 million drop since he took presidential office in January 2017.

Source: Forbes



During his presidential campaign, Trump claimed he had a net worth of $10 billion —three times as much as it really was.

Source: Business Insider and Time



Still, he's made history as the first billionaire to serve as President of the United States.

Source: Time



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said billionaires shouldn't exist as long as Americans live in abject poverty

$
0
0

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

  • Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said a society that allows billionaires to exist while some Americans live in abject poverty is "immoral."  
  • She said Americans shouldn't normalize economic inequality by idealizing the super-rich during a conversation with author Ta-Nehisi Coates at an event honoring the legacy of Martin Luther King Jr. on Monday. 
  • The New York Democrat recently suggested the US should hike marginal tax rates on Americans making more than $10 million. 

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said a society that "allows billionaires to exist" while some Americans live in abject poverty is "immoral."  

"I'm not saying that Bill Gates or Warren Buffett are immoral, but a system that allows billionaires to exist when there are parts of Alabama where people are still getting ringworm because they don't have access to public health is wrong," Ocasio-Cortez said during an event honoring the legacy of Martin Luther King Jr. on Monday. 

The 29-year-old lawmaker said the existence of billionaires is a byproduct of skyrocketing economic inequality and suggested that Americans shouldn't strive to become super-rich. 

"Maybe this idea of idealizing this outcome of 'Maybe one day you too can be a billionaire and earn more than millions of families combined' is not an aspirational or good thing," she said during her MLK Day conversation with author Ta-Nehisi Coates. 

Ocasio-Cortez, who stunned the political world when she beat longtime incumbent Rep. Joe Crowley in New York's Democratic primary last June, centered her candidacy around economic justice.

Read more: THE TRUTH ABOUT ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ: The inside story of how, in just one year, Sandy the bartender became a lawmaker who triggers both parties

Her policy platform includes a host of bold proposals — including a federal jobs guarantee and Medicare for All, which is a single-payer healthcare system supported by progressive Democrats — that would alleviate poverty and economic inequality. And, along with a growing faction of Democratic candidates, she banned corporate PAC money from her campaign. 

She's not the first prominent Democrat to scrutinize the role of billionaires and the super-rich in American society and politics. Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have long railed against growing economic inequality and the outsize influence of corporations and wealthy donors in US politics. 

Ocasio-Cortez — like Sanders and Warren — has long said poverty and a lack of social mobility are the most foundational injustices in American society. 

"I think it's wrong that the majority of the country doesn't make a living wage, I think it's wrong that you can work 100 hours and not feed your kids," Ocasio-Cortez told Coates. "I think it's wrong that corporations like Walmart and Amazon can get paid by the government, experiencing a wealth transfer from the public, for paying people less than a minimum wage."

One of the new congresswoman's policy advisers, Dan Riffle, uses the Twitter handle "Every Billionaire Is A Policy Failure" and said Monday that he hopes Ocasio-Cortez can start a new conversation in the Democratic Party around targeting the super-rich.  

"My goal for this year is to get a moderator to ask 'Is it morally appropriate for anyone to be a billionaire?' at one of the Dem primary debates," Riffle tweeted. "Ta-Nehisi just asked @aoc that question on stage at #MLKNow so we're getting somewhere. She said it isn't btw." 

Ocasio-Cortez made waves when she announced her support for a 60% t0 70% marginal tax rate on annual income above $10 million earlier this month. Conservatives have characterized the proposal as radical socialism, while many progressive economists and Democrats have praised the idea. 

Recent polling, including an INSIDER poll, has found strong support for hiking marginal tax rates on the super-rich.

"The question of marginal tax rates is a policy question but it's also a moral question," Ocasio-Cortez said during her talk with Coates. "What kind of society do we want to live in? Are we comfortable with a society where someone can have a personal helipad while this city is experiencing the highest levels of poverty and homelessness since the Great Depression?"

SEE ALSO: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's 70% tax on the super-rich is more popular than Trump's tax cuts, new poll shows

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: MSNBC host Chris Hayes thinks President Trump's stance on China is 'not at all crazy'

17 billionaires who lost the most in the past year

$
0
0

Mark Zuckerberg

  • When it comes to billionaires in the media, the focus often tends to be on how much money they've accumulated.
  • However, according to a Bloomberg report, 2018 saw a number of the world's richest billionaires lose considerable sums of money.
  • Among those who lost the most were Mark Zuckerberg, Amancio Ortega, and Carlos Slim, but the majority were based in Asia, with China-based billionaires taking up six spots in the ranking.


Usually in financial media, the focus tends to be on how large billionaires' fortunes are and by how much they've grown - however Bloomberg recently published a report on the ups and the downs of some of the richest people in the world.

By looking at Bloomberg's index and extracting information about who in the ranking lost the most in wealth over the past year, a number of high-profile CEOs and businessmen have suffered billion-dollar losses.

The majority of those in the ranking are based in Asia and, though those in the top three spots are based in the West, six of the billionaires who lost most money were based in China - in total, all the billionaires racked up losses of over $153.387 billion.

These are the billionaires who lost the most between January 2, 2018 and January 2, 2019 according to Bloomberg's ranking.

SEE ALSO: The number of ultra-rich people is growing fastest in these countries

17. Yongxing Liu

Position: President and CEO of East Hope
Sector: Industrial
Country: China
Ranking in the Bloomberg Billionaires Index: 192
Losses in the last year: $5.46 billion
Total fortune: $7.89 billion



16. Lee Kun-Hee

Position: President of Samsung
Sector: Technological, Industrial
Country: South Korea
Ranking in the Bloomberg Billionaires Index: 59
Losses in the last year: $5.51 billion
Total fortune: $16.5 billion



15. Lakshmi Mittal

Position: President and CEO of Arcelor Mittal
Sector: Raw materials, iron and steel industry
Country: India
Ranking in the Bloomberg Billionaires Index: 79
Losses in the last year: $5.85 billion
Total fortune: $14.6 billion



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Billionaire Ken Griffin just bought a $238 million penthouse — and it's the most expensive home ever sold in the US

$
0
0

ken griffin nyc penthouse most expensive home

Billionaire hedge-fund manager Ken Griffin just paid $238 million for a New York City penthouse, breaking the record for the most expensive home ever sold in the US, The Wall Street Journal reported. 

The transaction smashed the previous record, set in in 2014 when another hedge-fund manager, Barry Rosenstein, bought a Hamptons home for $137 million, by more than $100 million.

Griffin's new Manhattan penthouse is a massive 23,000-square-foot residence that encompasses floors 50 through 53 at 220 Central Park South, a skyscraper designed by Robert A.M. Stern that's still under construction. The asking price was $250 million, according to The Real Deal.

A spokeswoman for Griffin told The Journal that Griffin, the 50-year-old founder of the hedge fund Citadel, wanted a place to stay in New York as Citadel expands its presence in the city with a new office.

ken griffin

Griffin's New York City purchase is part of a massive real-estate buying spree over the past few years.

Just this week, Forbes reported that Griffin paid $122 million for one of the most expensive homes ever sold in London, a mansion down the street from Buckingham Palace. 

Earlier this year, Griffin, who's worth an estimated $8.84 billion, according to Bloomberg, broke a real-estate record in Chicago when he bought several floors of a condominium for $58.75 million, according to The Journal. And back in 2015, he bought a penthouse in Miami Beach for $60 million, breaking the record for the most expensive condo sold in Miami. 

Griffin has also reportedly spent nearly $250 million on gathering land on which to build a mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, bringing his real estate spending in the past few years to nearly $750 million.

At Griffin's New York penthouse, his neighbors will include the musician Sting and the hedge-fund manager Daniel Och of Och-Ziff Capital Management, who both recently bought units at 220 Central Park West, according to The Journal.

Corcoran agent Deborah Kern represented the developer of 220 Central Park South in the sale to Griffin. Griffin was represented by Tal and Oren Alexander of Douglas Elliman.

Despite the astronomical purchase price, Griffin's New York City pad is not the most expensive real-estate deal in the world. 

In 2017, Hong Kong billionaire Yeung Kin-man paid $361 million for a property in Hong Kong's wealthiest and most exclusive neighborhood, The Peak, as Business Insider previously reported. A $446 million house for sale in the same neighborhood could break the record for most expensive home sold in the world.

SEE ALSO: Shaq is selling his lakeside Florida mansion for $22 million, and it comes with a 17-car garage and a 6,000-square-foot basketball court — here's a look inside

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: We compared Apple's $159 AirPods to Xiaomi's $30 AirDots and the winner was clear


Tesla reportedly spent $700,000 on Elon Musk's private-jet travel in 2018, including flights to move his jet from one side of LA to another (TSLA)

$
0
0

Elon Musk

  • The Washington Post reported that Tesla spent $700,000 on private-jet travel for its billionaire CEO, Elon Musk, last year.
  • Some of the flights were simply to move the jet from one side of Los Angeles to another.
  • In January, Tesla laid off 7% of its workforce.

Tesla, the California-based electric-vehicle company, spent $700,000 on private-jet travel for its CEO, Elon Musk, last year, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post.

Musk's jet, a $70 million Gulfstream G650ER, logged about 150,000 miles flying all over the United States, Europe, and Asia. The Post reported that some of the jet's flights were merely to get it from one side of Los Angeles — where Musk lives in a five-mansion compound — to another.

From The Washing Post story:

Musk’s jet flew roughly 75 times last year to the San Jose airport, the closest stop to Tesla’s headquarters in Palo Alto and car-making factory in Fremont, where Musk often said he was so busy he would end up sleeping among the machines. Dozens of other flights were made to airports near SpaceX’s headquarters in Hawthorne, Calif., and the battery-producing Gigafactory outside Reno, Nev.

Tesla said Musk never used the plane to fly between different spots in Los Angeles. But the jet would fly to meet him at a closer airport if, say, he began his workday at SpaceX’s office on the south side of L.A. and the plane was on the north side, the company said. Some of these repositioning flights only went about 20 miles, the aircraft data show.

Tesla, known in the investment world for its prodigious cash burning, has turned a profit only three times in its history, and never on an annual basis.

In June, the company laid off 9% of its workforce, and it laid off another 7% earlier this month. In a letter to employees announcing the most recent layoffs, Musk said there wasn't "any other way."

Read the full story of Musk's air travel at the Washington Post >>

Were you affected by the Tesla layoffs? Have a story to share? Contact Business Insider's Linette Lopez at llopez@businessinsider.com and Mark Matousek at mmatousek@businessinsider.com.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Go inside the Chrysler factory that makes Jeep Wranglers

The 13 tech billionaires who donate the biggest percentage of their wealth to charity

$
0
0

warren buffett bill gates

  • Billions are given to charity each year, with some of the biggest donations coming both from large companies and from some of the wealthiest people in the world.
  • Compare the Market, a price comparison website in the UK, has found which billionaires have donated the largest percentages of their wealth to charity.
  • Here are the most charitable billionaires in the tech industry, according to the percentage of their net worths they've given away.

Philanthropy has become an important initiative for some of the richest people in the world.

In recent years, there's been an emergence of charitable donations coming out of Silicon Valley. Looking at the Chronicle of Philanthropy's top 50 philanthropists list for 2017, 60% of the people on the list are from the technology industry.

A recent analysis from UK price comparison website Compare the Market found which billionaires have donated the largest percentage of their net worths. There's only one billionaire who currently donates more than half of his wealth to charity: businessman Warren Buffett, the third richest man in the world.

These figures are based on publicly available information, so any private donations are not included in the calculated numbers. The billionaires' net worths are based on Forbes' 2018 list of the wealthiest people in the world.

Here are the 13 most charitable billionaires in tech, based on percentage of their wealth they donate:

SEE ALSO: Chaos has reportedly erupted inside Facebook as employees find themselves unable to open the company's apps on their iPhones

13. Steve Ballmer — 0.32%

2018 net worth: $38.4 billion

Amount donated: $121 million

How he made his billions: Ballmer is a former CEO at Microsoft who joined the company early on as its 30th employee.

Donations made: Ballmer and his wife run the Ballmer Group, a charity that focuses on "efforts to improve economic mobility for children and families in the United States who are disproportionately likely to remain in poverty." The Ballmers' foundation has pledged millions to Harvard University, the University of Washington, and the University of Oregon.



12. Jack Ma — 0.33%

2018 net worth: $39 billion

Amount donated: $129.4 million

How he made his billions: Ma is the cofounder and executive chairman of Alibaba Group, one of the largest e-commerce companies in the world. With Ma at the helm, Alibaba had one of the biggest IPOs ever when it went public in 2014. Ma and Alibaba have invested billions in tech companies.

Donations made: When Ma announced he would be retiring from his role as Alibaba's executive chairman, he said it was so he could dedicate more time and money to his philanthropy, the Jack Ma Foundation. The charity was founded in 2014 and focuses its efforts on improving China's education system, especially in rural areas. The company pledged $45 million in 2017 to "help discover and cultivate future teaching talent in the rural regions of China."



11. Masayoshi Son — 0.53%

2018 net worth: $22.7 billion

Amount donated: $120 million

How he made his billions: Son is the founder and CEO of SoftBank, a huge Japanese investment firm that's put billions into tech startups like the We Company, Slack, and Uber.

Donations made: Son pledged about $120 million to support the victims of the 2011 Japanese earthquake and tsunami that resulted in more than 15,000 deaths. SoftBank donated an additional $12.5 million, and Son pledged to donate his annual salary to the victims until he retires. Son is also the founder and president of the Masason Foundation, which works to "support those who will create the future."



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Bill Gross is retiring with a $1.5 billion net worth — see how the 'Bond King' spends his fortune, from a $1.3 billion divorce to a massive real-estate portfolio

$
0
0

bill gross

"Bond King" Bill Gross is saying goodbye to Wall Street.

Gross, 74, is retiring from the financial industry he worked in for more than 40 years, he said on Monday. In 1971, Gross founded Pimco, where he served as the managing director and chief investment officer. In 2014, he joined the global asset-management firm Janus Henderson.

During that time, Gross amassed a fortune that was worth at least $2.5 billion at one point. After he was embroiled in a nasty divorce, his estimated net worth dropped to $1.5 billion— but that's nothing to scoff at.

Aside from the $1.3 billion that went to his ex-wife post-divorce, Gross has dropped a large chunk of his fortune on two things: real estate and philanthropy.

Throughout the years, Gross has purchased a series of homes along California's coast, namely in Laguna Beach, creating an impressive real-estate portfolio. Equally impressive is the $700 million he's donated to charity — and that doesn't even scratch the surface, seeing as he said he plans to focus on working with charitable organizations during retirement.

Below, see how Gross spends his fortune.

SEE ALSO: 'Bond King' Bill Gross is retiring

DON'T MISS: A fake Picasso, private investigators, and fart spray: Inside the nasty divorce of bond billionaire Bill Gross

"Bond King" Bill Gross has an estimated net worth of $1.5 billion.

Source: Forbes



Gross founded the investment-management firm Pimco in 1971. The firm would eventually reach a peak of $2 trillion in assets under management, and Gross' personal bank account grew with it.

Source: Forbes, Business Insider



In 1999, the German insurer Allianz bought Pimco, and Gross began earning a $200 million annual salary. In 2013, he received a $290 million bonus.

Source: Bloomberg, Business Insider



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Facebook is now 15 years old. Here's a look into the life, career, and controversies surrounding CEO Mark Zuckerberg (FB)

$
0
0

Mark Zuckerberg

  • Facebook turned 15 years old on Monday, marking the anniversary of Mark Zuckerberg launching the social network on February 4, 2004.
  • As Facebook CEO, Zuckerberg has been the face of the social network through its massive growth, as well as its many controversies.
  • We've created a timeline outlining Zuckerberg's trajectory, from growing up in a New York City suburb to defending Facebook as it's hit with scandal after scandal.

Through success and controversy, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been regarded as one of the most brilliant minds of his generation. 

With a 2018 net worth of $71 billion, the young CEO is credited with creating a social network that has more monthly active users than any single country in the world has people, and his majority voting rights give him complete control of the company — which also means he's often the focal point of any backlash or scandal.

And for the last two years, Facebook has faced scandal after scandal. It's been called out on multiple occasions for the way it handles user data, to the point where it's led many to debate the pros and cons of free networks like Facebook that rely on advertisers for revenue. In 2018, Zuckerberg was summoned to give 10 hours of testimony to Congress as lawmakers sought answers about Facebook's role in various events like the 2016 election and the Cambridge Analytica data-harvesting scandal.

In the midst of the scandals, Zuckerberg has defended Facebook and reiterated the company's stated mission to connect the world with projects like bringing internet access to areas without less connectivity; through his charity work, he's poured millions into education efforts and billions into initiatives for curing the world's diseases. 

But the recent revelations have put a spotlight on Zuckerberg and his company like never before. Here's a look at the timeline of Zuckerberg's career, from his humble beginnings in a New York suburb to his role as one of the wealthiest CEOs in the world:

SEE ALSO: 33 photos of Facebook's rise from a Harvard dorm room to world domination

While he's now a titan of Silicon Valley, Mark Zuckerberg was raised in the quaint town of Dobbs Ferry, New York. He was born to Edward and Karen Zuckerberg, a dentist and psychiatrist, respectively. He has three siblings: Randi, Donna, and Arielle.



A precocious child, Mark at age 12 created a messaging program called "Zucknet" using Atari BASIC. He also coded computer games for his friends at a young age.

Source: Bio



While attending high school at the renowned Phillips Exeter Academy in New Hampshire, he built an early music streaming platform, which both AOL and Microsoft showed interest in. Still a teen, he rejected offers for an acquisition or a job.

Source: Bio

 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

These are the 11 richest women in tech

$
0
0

women in tech 4x3

  • Sheryl Sandberg, Laurene-Powell Jobs, and Meg Whitman are some of the most well-known women in tech who are each worth more than a billion dollars.
  • The number of tech-industry women on Forbes' ranking of the world's wealthiest people is significantly lower than the amount of men in tech that dominate the rankings.
  • These are the 11 richest women in the tech industry, based on Forbes' billionaires list.

Women make up only a tiny percentage of leadership positions in major companies, and an even smaller amount are executives in the technology sector.

The first woman in tech to appear in Forbes' annual ranking of the world's wealthiest people doesn't show up until the No. 57 spot, where Laurene Powell Jobs sits with a cool $18.5 billion net worth.

Business Insider has compiled a list of the richest women in tech, based on their net worths on February 1st as shown on Forbes' rankings. Some of the names on the list — like Sheryl Sandberg and Laurene Powell-Jobs — you may recognize, but there are powerful women heading up tech companies in China and Hong Kong in the rankings as well.

Here are the 11 richest women in tech around the world, based on their net worths:

SEE ALSO: 13 power couples that rule tech

11. Sheryl Sandberg — $1.6 billion

Ranking on Forbes' list of world's wealthiest: 1,396

Age: 49

Country: United States

Source of wealth: Sandberg is the chief operating officer at Facebook, and previously served as Google's vice president of global online sales and operations. 



10. Zeng Fangqin — $1.6 billion

Ranking on Forbes' list of world's wealthiest: 1,389

Age: 53

Country: China

Source of wealth: Zeng is the chairwoman for Lingyi Technology, which supplies electronic components for smartphones, tablets, and laptops for major companies such as Huawei and Apple.



9. Wang Laichun — $2.0 billion

Ranking on Forbes' list of world's wealthiest: 1,161

Age: 51

Country: China

Source of wealth: Wang serves as the chairwoman of Luxshare Precision, which manufacturers electronic connectors for companies like Apple. Wang has also previously worked for Foxconn.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Billionaire and likely presidential hopeful Howard Schultz doesn't want people calling him a 'billionaire' (SBUX)

$
0
0

Howard Schultz

  • Howard Schultz, a likely presidential hopeful and former Starbucks CEO, took issue with the word "billionaire" in his response to a question about the political influence of the wealthy.
  • At a book event on Monday, Schultz swapped out the word for the term "people of means."
  • "The moniker 'billionaire' now has become the catchphrase," he said.

Billionaire Howard Schultz isn't a fan of being called a billionaire.

On Monday, the former Starbucks CEO and chairman sat down with the New York Times reporter Andrew Ross Sorkin to talk about his book"From the Ground Up: A Journey to Reimagine the Promise of America."

Sorkin asked Schultz to respond to a question from "Winner Takes All" author Anand Giridharadas — who's been critical of Schultz's political ambitions — about whether or not billionaires wield too much political power in the US.

Schultz appeared to take issue with the question's phrasing, saying, "The moniker 'billionaire' now has become the catchphrase." Schultz's team didn't immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment.

"I would rephrase that and say people of means have been able to leverage their wealth and their interest in ways that are unfair," Schultz said. "And I think that speaks to the inequality, but it also directly speaks to the special interests that are paid for by people of wealth and corporations who are looking for influence, and they have such unbelievable influence on the politicians who are steeped in the ideology of both parties."

Read more: Insiders reveal why Starbucks' former CEO Howard Schultz is willing to ruin his life to run for president

The likely presidential hopeful's net worth is about $3.5 billion, according to Forbes. And his comments come at a time when notable Democratic politicians, such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Elizabeth Warren, and Bernie Sanders, are calling for higher taxes on the wealthy.

But Schultz's concern about the word "billionaire" echoes that of another famous billionaire: Elon Musk.

On July 10, 2018, Musk tweeted that the media uses the term "billionaire" to "devalue" and "denigrate" people. Musk's net worth is $21.3 billion, according to Forbes.

For his part, Schultz ended his response to Giridharadas' question by stressing that he's not beholden to either major US political party.

"All I'm trying to do is one thing: walk in the shoes of the American people," he said.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: LEAKED VIDEO: Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz tells workers Trump is 'creating chaos' that's affecting the economy

Calls to 'abolish billionaires' raise eyebrows, but they've been a long time coming

$
0
0

alexandria ocasio cortez

  • A New York Times editorial titled "Abolish Billionaires" introduced many readers to an increasingly strong rallying cry on the American left.
  • Progressive politicians are calling for significantly increased taxes on the rich to counteract exceptionally high levels of wealth inequality in the US.
  • While there may be eyebrow-raising rhetoric around these policies, they aren't radical.
  • This article is part of Business Insider's ongoing series on "Better Capitalism."

For the first time on a large scale, Americans are debating whether to allow the existence of billionaires.

On Thursday, The New York Times published columnist Farhad Manjoo's "It's high time we abolish billionaires" above the fold on the front page of its print edition. While Manjoo is far from the first person to articulate the idea — see freshman congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's call for a 70% tax rate for income above $10 million or Sen. Elizabeth Warren's call for a 3% wealth tax for fortunes above $1 billion — the unequivocal rallying cry was something different for the paper of record.

The ensuing arguments about his piece were about what you'd expect: ad hominem attacks and the pitting of capitalism against socialism. A Fox News panel called Manjoo "an idiot" and dismissed the critique of inequality as an attack on capitalism. Readers raised examples of "good billionaires."

Democrats have been arguing for years now about the value of socialism, but as Ocasio-Cortez's policy adviser Dan Riffle — known for his Twitter handle "Every Billionaire is a Policy Failure"— alluded to in a tweet, even if AOC, Sen. Bernie Sanders, or Warren are too radical for you, just look at what Trump-appointed Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell is saying.

"We want prosperity to be widely shared. We need policies to make that happen," Powell said on Wednesday, according to the Washington Post. "The U.S. lags now in mobility. And that's not our self-image as a country, nor is it where we want to be. ... We have some work to do to make sure that the prosperity we do achieve is widely spread."

Regardless of an ideological lens, there's a growing consensus: The United States needs a course correction, and decreasing inequality is crucial.

The rich are clearly getting richer

The French economist Thomas Piketty wrote that, "the incomes of the top 1% collectively made up 11% of national income in 1980, but now constitute above 20% of national income, while the 20% of US national income that was attributable to the bottom 50% in 1980 has fallen to just 12% today."

Additionally, he wrote, "while average pre-tax income for the bottom 50% has stagnated at around $16,000 since 1980, the top 1% has experienced 300% growth in their incomes to approximately $1,340,000 in 2014. This has increased the average earnings differential between the top 1% and the bottom 50% from 27 times in 1980 to 81 times today."

It's not wild, then, to call the moment we're in America's "second Gilded Age," referring to the post-Civil War era of robber barons and industry, where the wealthy kept living better and the poor kept getting worse.

Occupy Wall Street remained relatively small in the wake of the financial crisis, but it did make income and wealth inequality, the language of the 99% and the 1%, a prime topic of discussion. Populist sentiment increased throughout the country, and Vermont's democratic-socialist senator and New York's celebrity real estate billionaire did better in the 2016 election than anyone predicted. The latter, Donald Trump, became president and right-wing rhetoric won, but it also brought with it standard conservative policies, like tax cuts for the rich.

Read more: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren's 'soak the rich' tax plans are supported by an increasing number of Americans

'Abolishing billionaires' isn't as radical as it seems

In his article in the Times and during a followup on Twitter, Manjoo proved to be less into the notion of going so far as to virtually capping how much money Americans could make — not even Ocasio-Cortez has advocated for that —but he is in support of significantly higher taxes on the rich. And you don't have to be a radical for that. There have been many polls that show the majority of Americans at this point are in favor of the same thing.

While "abolish billionaires" is an eye-catching phrase with radical implications, raising taxes to pre-1980s levels is certainly not radical, said Stephanie Sterling, vice president of advocacy and and policy at the Roosevelt Institute.

Sterling told Business Insider that questioning the role of billionaires in our society "is an important contribution to the debate," because it's focusing on structural changes that need to take place, to keep extreme wealth from harming the economy.

What the country needs, she said, is "robust antitrust policy, meaningful limits on stock buybacks, much higher tax rates, and the meaningful restoration of the ability to form and join unions." If getting riled up about billionaires leads voters to elect officials who support those policies, that will successfully correct for what she considers to be the mistakes of the past 40 years.

"I think we're all passengers in a billionaire hijacking," author and critic Anand Giridharadas told Business Insider about how the US got to a boiling point. "We were all drugged on the plane, and these guys are now terrified in the cockpit because they're realizing that in the back there we just woke up."

The billionaires themselves are taking sides

Potential presidential candidates and fellow billionaires Howard Schultz and Michael Bloomberg are not fans of Ocasio-Cortez's call for a 70% tax rate for income above $10 million or Warren's call for a 3% wealth tax for fortunes above $1 billion, and have used phrases like "un-American" and referred to chaos in Venezuela as proof of where these policies would lead.

Investor and progressive activist Nick Hanauer, however, saw this coming. Hanauer, whose fortune must approach $1 billion considering he signed Warren Buffett and Bill Gates' Giving Pledge, famously wrote in Politico a few years ago that "the pitchforks are coming."

He told Business Insider that he's been seriously considering the notion that every billionaire is a policy failure, saying "there can be no doubt that the thrust of the argument is correct — that in a country where so many people are barely getting by, or not getting by at all, an economy that mints billionaires is structurally deficient. There is no reasonable moral or practical justification for these disparities in wealth and income."

Hanauer noted that even with significantly higher taxes, America's wealthiest would remain on top, and their buying power would remain relative.

"I also feel strongly that the Neoliberal contention that me getting immensely wealthy does not harm you, and that your objection to it is just petty jealousy is also wrong," he said. "The richer the rich get, the farther apart the rungs of opportunity are stretched. An economy dominated by a few people with infinite wealth is characterized by arms races for status that benefit no one and harm most people."

SEE ALSO: 'We're all passengers in a billionaire hijacking' says the critic who has the world's richest people buzzing

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's the massive gap in average income between the top 1% and the bottom 99% in every state


Bill Gates says the politicians proposing 70% income tax rates for the superrich are 'missing the picture'

$
0
0

Bill Gates

  • The billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates says there's a "misfocus" in the way America's wealthiest residents are taxed.
  • He told The Verge's Nilay Patel that if you focus on raising the ordinary income tax rate for America's superrich, "you're missing the picture." The highest earners often have wealth tied to company stock, which isn't taxed as "ordinary income," Gates said.
  • "We can be more progressive without really threatening income generation — what you have left to decide how to spread around," he said.

There's been a lot of talk lately of upping taxes for America's highest earners.

But Bill Gates thinks there's a "misfocus" on how the US government taxes the wealthiest residents, he said during a recent podcast interview with The Verge's Nilay Patel.

"In terms of revenue collection, you wouldn't want to just focus on the ordinary income rate, because people who are wealthy have a rounding error of ordinary income," said Gates, who's worth about $96 billion.

Gates said America's wealthiest people have complicated financial situations that the US tax system doesn't recognize.

A bonus just for you: Click here to claim 30 days of access to Business Insider PRIME

"They have income that just is the value of their stock, which, if they don't sell it, it doesn't show up in income at all, or if it shows up, it shows over in the capital-gains side," he said. "So the ability of hedge-fund people, or various people — they aren't paying that ordinary rate, ordinary income rate.

"The one thing that never gets much press: The IRS shows the statistics for the top 400 people of the highest income and the rate they pay ... It's about a 20% rate, so it has nothing to do with the 39.6% marginal ordinary income rate," Gates said. "So it's a misfocus. If you focus on that, you're missing the picture."

For the 2014 tax year, the most recent data available from the IRS, the average top tax rate for the 400 Americans with the highest adjusted gross income was 23.13%.

Since the start of the year, there's been a flood of wealth-tax proposals. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has suggested a 60% to 70% top tax rate for Americans earning $10 million or more. Sen. Elizabeth Warren introduced a plan to levy a 2% tax on wealthy Americans' assets over $50 million and 3% for assets over $1 billion. Sen. Bernie Sanders' "For the 99.8% Act"would impose a graduated scale for the estate tax that increases to a 77% rate for assets in excess of $1 billion.

Read more:Billionaires who hate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's 70% tax on the superrich are adamant it will hurt the economy — but history suggests otherwise

The US operates on a progressive tax system. How much you pay in taxes depends on several factors, including whether you're single or married, and, of course, how much you earn. President Donald Trump's tax plan went into effect in January 2018, mandating new income tax brackets for American taxpayers; the top marginal tax rate is 37%.

Your tax bracket applies to only the amount you earn above the minimum income threshold for that bracket. For income below that limit, you pay the same amount of federal income taxes as everyone else, even if they earn less overall.

"I believe US tax rates can be more progressive," Gates said. "Now you finally have some politicians who are so extreme that I'd say, 'No, that's even beyond.'"

He continued: "You do start to create tax dodging and disincentives, and an incentive to have the income show up in other countries and things. But we can be more progressive — the estate tax and the tax on capital, the way the FICA and Social Security taxes work.

"We can be more progressive without really threatening income generation — what you have left to decide how to spread around."

SEE ALSO: After talking to teens about anger management, Bill Gates admits that some of his Microsoft meltdowns were over the top

DON'T MISS: Bill and Melinda Gates revealed their 9 biggest surprises from 2018 in a letter dedicated to Microsoft's late cofounder

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Bill Gates has a net worth of over $96 billion — here's how he makes and spends his money

The critic who has the world's richest people buzzing says Americans must not elect another billionaire president

$
0
0

anand giridharadas

  • "Winners Take All" author Anand Giridharadas has emerged as an outspoken critic of the elite and a champion of progressive politicians.
  • He believes that America's most pressing problem is its wide inequality, and that potential presidential candidates Howard Schultz and Michael Bloomberg would be unwilling to make necessary changes like significantly increasing taxes on the rich.
  • This article is part of Business Insider's ongoing series on Better Capitalism.

Since former Starbucks chairman Howard Schultz announced that he's considering a centrist, independent run for president of the United States, the growing populist resentment of billionaires like Schultz (who prefers the label "person of means") has bubbled to the surface.

For Anand Giridharadas, author of "Winners Take All," Schultz — along with former New York City mayor and fellow billionaire businessman Michael Bloomberg, who is also considering a run as a Democrat — has shown why we don't need a billionaire president to replace the one we already have.

A bonus just for you: Click here to claim 30 days of access to Business Insider PRIME

In a recent interview with Business Insider, Giridharadas said their performance so far — like the way Schultz has dismissed progressive tax proposals like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's call for a 70% marginal rate on income above $10 million as "un-American" and how Bloomberg said that Sen. Elizabeth Warren's proposed 3% wealth tax for fortunes above $1 billion was "unconstitutional" and would lead to lead to chaos like in socialist Venezuela— proves that even if they earnestly want to "do good," they're reluctant to make structural changes the US needs.

"These old billionaire, encrusted oligarchs are really showing their terror," Giridharadas said. He believes that income and wealth inequality has hampered American growth — which Fed chairman Jerome Powell has also stated— and that to correct it, the country's wealthiest are going to have to lose some of their influence over society.

"For the first time in my lifetime, we're talking about whether billionaires should be able to be here, and I think my message to these guys is, you are free to go," he said. "If you think it's confiscatory to have a 3% wealth tax, you're absolutely free to go."

Read More:Wealthy investor Nick Hanauer says the US economy mints billionaires while many Americans are struggling, and there's no excuse for it

Wealthy Seattle-based venture capitalist and progressive activist Nick Hanauer knows, respects, and likes Schultz, but agrees with Giridharadas' main point. "I just do not believe that the country at this point needs what Howard thinks of as, I think they call it 'centrism,' which basically in the Democratic party is straight-up trickle-down economics but without the racism," Hanauer said on his podcast, "Pitchfork Economics."

And, as a collection of polls has shown, the majority of Americans are in favor of increasing taxes on the rich, and are in favor of the proposals Warren has proposed as presidential candidate, which she drew up along with University of California Berkeley economists Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman.

"The kind of change I'm talking about sounds scary to people, but it should only really sound scary to a very few people, who have been profiting from an unfair system," Giridharadas said. "They are scared that people now realize that America actually doesn't have to be run for billionaires' benefit. What is actually un-American, to use Howard Schultz's term, is an America run for the few. That's not the promise on which this country was founded."

SEE ALSO: 'We're all passengers in a billionaire hijacking' says the critic who has the world's richest people buzzing

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The wealth of these 8 men equals the bottom 50% of the entire world

Here are the world's richest black billionaires

$
0
0
  • Of the 2,043 billionaires in the world, fewer than 1% of them are black. 
  • These 11 black billionaires are telecom giants, media moguls, and more.
  • Watch the video above to find out how billionaires like Oprah and Michael Jordan built their wealth

Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, and Jeff Bezos may be the richest men in the world, but they aren't the only billionaires. 11 of the world's billionaires — fewer than 1% — are black. They're comprised of media moguls, telecom giants, and more.

Following is a transcript of the video.

11. Mohammed Ibrahim: $1.18 billion (net worth)

Ibrahim became a billionaire after selling his telecommunications company. Now he focuses on improving the lives of Africans through the Mo Ibrahim Foundation. 

10. Michael Lee-Chin: $1.19 billion (net worth)

Lee-Chin owns a 65% stake in National Commercial Bank Jamaica. 

9. Strive Masiyiwa: $1.39 billion (net worth)

Masiyiwa is the founder of Econet Group, a mobile phone company. He is Zimbabwe's first billionaire. 

8. Michael Jordan: $1.65 billion (net worth)

Jordan made $90 million from his basketball career. He makes over $100 million a year from his shoe deal with Nike and owns a stake in the Charlotte Hornets. 

7. Folorunsho Alakija: $1.7 billion (net worth)

Alakija is vice chair of Nigerian oil company Famfa Oil. Her son's wedding cost nearly $6 million. 

6. Patrice Motsepe: $2.5 billion (net worth)

Motsepe was Africa's first billionaire thanks to his mining company. He promised to donate at least half of his wealth to charity. 

5. Isabel Dos Santos: $2.6 billion (net worth)

At 45 years old, she is the youngest black billionaire in the world. Her father is Jose Eduardo Dos Santos, former president of Angola. 

4. Oprah Winfrey: $2.7 billion (net worth)

Winfrey became a media mogul with the "Oprah Winfrey Show." She is now the CEO of OWN, a cable TV channel. 

3. Robert Smith: $4.4 billion (net worth)

Smith became a billionaire after leaving Goldman Sachs to start his own private equity firm. 

2. Mike Adenuga: $5.3 billion (net worth)

Adenuga is chairman of telecommunications company Globacom. He earned an MBA from Pace University and used to drive a taxi. 

1. Aliko Dangote: $14.1 billion (net worth)

Dangote is the richest man in Africa. He's also the largest producer of cement in Africa. He founded Dangote Foundation, which focuses on education, agriculture, and health. 

Join the conversation about this story »

Patriots owner Bob Kraft was just charged with soliciting prostitution. Here's how he made his $4.3 billion fortune, from working at his father-in-law's packaging company to buying the NFL team for $172 million.

$
0
0

robert kraft

Robert Kraft, the billionaire owner of the New England Patriots, was charged with two counts of soliciting prostitution on Friday.

Kraft, who also owns two-and-a-half paper companies, a shopping mall, an office park, and a soccer team, is worth at least $4.36 billion — although another estimate puts his net worth at $6.6 billion.

Here's a look at the wealth, career, and life of the Patriots owner.

SEE ALSO: Patriots owner Robert Kraft charged with 2 counts of soliciting prostitution

DON'T MISS: Trump called New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft every week for a year to console him after his wife's death

Robert Kraft, the billionaire owner of the NFL's New England Patriots, is worth an estimated $4.36 billion, according to Bloomberg. Forbes, however, estimates a higher net worth of $6.6 billion.

Source: BloombergForbes



The Patriots owner was charged with two counts of soliciting prostitution on February 22, 2019.

Source: Business Insider



Kraft made his fortune in paper manufacturing.

Source: Forbes via Business Insider



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

US inequality is only getting worse, and the 'dynastic wealth' bemoaned by Warren Buffett may be one of the reasons why

$
0
0

rich couple

  • Income inequality has increased in the US over the years, and many consider generational wealth to be one of its key causes.
  • The fortunes of US family dynasties have been on the rise, and some rich families are taking advantage of new tax laws that make it more flexible for them to pass money on to their heirs.
  • Some billionaires are thinking twice about how they're tackling generational wealth; Bill Gates and Warren Buffett plan to give most of their money away through the Giving Pledge, instead of keeping it in the family.

The median American family owns just over $80,000 in household wealth, while 15 family dynasties own a combined $618 billion.

That's according to the left-leaning Institute for Policy Studies' Billionaire Bonanza report, which examined the growing concentration of wealth in the US by looking at 15 dynastically wealthy families from the Forbes 400 list and data from the Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finance.

"Each of these family's wealth comes from companies started by an earlier generation, either a parent or more distant ancestor," states the report. "Each of them also represents a wealth dynasty passing generation to generation free from interruption."  

Since 1982, the combined wealth of three families — the Waltons, the Kochs, and the Mars — increased by 5,868%, while the median household wealth over the same period decreased by 3%. The families' combined wealth totals $348.7 billion, quadruple the median wealth of US families.

Read more: The 25 richest American families, ranked

"A lot of folks don't like to acknowledge the big leg up they get in things like buying a house or avoiding significant student debt as a result of generational wealth," Josh Hoxie, director of the Project on Opportunity and Taxation at the Institute for Policy Studies, told Business Insider.

"That leads to big problems when other people who don't have generational wealth look around and wonder why they're so far behind," he continued. "The reality is that the top indicator for economic prosperity is not hard work or intelligence, it's the family you're born into."

Generational wealth is seen as a key contributor to the gap between the rich and the poor

From 1978 to 2012, the amount of wealth among the richest .1% of families in the US grew from 7% to 22%, according to a University of California, Berkeley study.

That figure nearly doubles to 40% when looking at the wealthiest 1% of American households, according to a paper published in 2017 by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

"Today's extreme wealth inequality is perhaps greater than any time in American history," Hoxie wrote in the Billionaire Bonanza report. "This is largely the result of rapidly growing wealth dynasties and a rigged economy that enables the ultra-wealthy to grow their wealth to never-before-seen highs."

In 2015, the income the bottom 99% of families took home was, on average, 26.3 times less than the top 1% of families, according to IRS data reported by the Economic Policy Institute, a nonprofit and nonpartisan think tank.

From 1980 to 2014, income doubled for the top 10% of earners, tripled for the top 1%, and quadrupled for the top .1%, according to The Quarterly Journal of Economics' "Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States." 

Read more: Calls to 'abolish billionaires' raise eyebrows, but they've been a long time coming

In an attempt to even the playing field between the richest and poorest Americans, a number of wealth-tax proposals have been introduced in 2019. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez suggested a 60% to 70% top tax rate for Americans earning $10 million or more. Sen. Elizabeth Warren introduced a plan to levy a 2% tax on wealthy Americans' assets over $50 million and 3% for assets over $1 billion. Sen. Bernie Sanders' "For the 99.8% Act" would impose a graduated scale for the estate tax that increases to a 77% rate for assets in excess of $1 billion.

And the idea of abolishing billionaires reached a boiling point with a column by Farhad Manjoo in the New York Times in early February.

New tax laws increase flexibility for passing down wealth

Passing wealth down from generation to generation usually happens through a trust.

Most families establish revocable living trusts (meaning they can be changed) as the centerpiece of an estate plan that becomes irrevocable (meaning they can't be amended) upon their death, Michael Rosen-Prinz, a partner in the Private Client Practice Group at McDermott, Will & Emery who works with ultra high-net-worth clients, told Business Insider. 

But recent tax reform has allowed for more flexibility in estate planning, Alicia Waltenberger, the director of wealth planning strategies at TIAA Institute, told Business Insider.

President Trump's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act doubled estate tax exemptions and gift tax exemptions. An estate tax is a tax on money or assets transferred upon the trustor's death, whereas a gift tax is imposed if the transfer occurs while the trustor is living. Several states have a separate state-level estate or inheritance tax.

An individual can transfer over $11 million in assets, and married couples more than $22 million, before being subject to federal estate taxes and federal gift taxes, according to Rosen-Prinz. The exemption amount is set to be halved at the end of 2025, and is subject to changes in new tax legislation, he said. 

"The IRS has made it clear that if the gift and estate tax exemption is reduced, it will have been a 'use it or lose it' situation," Rosen-Prinz said.

Sheltering taxes— methods to reduce one's tax liability — leaves more money for families to pass on to other family members, who can use it to grow their wealth if they choose.

Consider Sheldon Adelson, CEO of casino company Las Vegas Sands who has an estimated net worth of $35.3 billion. From 2010 to 2013, he passed on $7.9 billion to his heirs while escaping $2.8 billion in gift taxes, The Washington Post reported.

"Some families with substantial wealth are using lifetime gifts as seed funding for irrevocable trusts, and then selling interests in closely held businesses and real estate at a discounted value to those trusts to further reduce the value of their taxable estates,"Rosen-Prinz said.

Read more: 7 strategies rich people use to pay less in taxes

"Gifting can be done for a variety of reasons," Waltenberger said, "including non-taxable reasons such as having the ability to see the enjoyment and use of the gifted assets now during lifetime, and taxable reasons such as shifting of assets expected to appreciate in the future, so that that appreciation happens in the hands of others, not us where it may be subject to potentially higher income tax rates and/or estate tax at some point."

These tactics are often viewed as the root of massive family wealth, widening the gap between America's rich and poor.

Some of the superrich are thinking twice about how they pass down wealth

The superrich are beginning to think twice about how they're passing wealth to their heirs, according to Rosen-Prinz.

"The previous generation's plan to just transfer as much money tax free down the family tree is being reconsidered in favor of a more nuanced approach based on the personalities and circumstances of the beneficiaries," Rosen-Prinz said.

Older generations may think about limiting the access their children will have to family wealth thanks to highly visible heirs and "trust fund babies" flaunting their wealth on social media, he added, and might include provisions to ensure that the trust can be modified in the future.

"Often, charities or 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations are included as additional discretionary beneficiaries — both to fulfill philanthropic wishes of the settlor and also as 'overflow valve' for additional wealth that may not further benefit the human beneficiaries of the trust," Rosen-Prinz said.

Or, the superrich could take a cue from high-profile billionaires Bill Gates and Warren Buffett.

Bill Gates, who has an estimated net worth of nearly $96 billion, and his wife, Melinda, created the Giving Pledge, in which wealthy individuals agree to donate the majority of their money. So far, 189 billionaires, or would-be billionaires, have joined.

The Gates themselves plan to leave only a fraction of their wealth to their children.

And Warren Buffett, the third-wealthiest person on the Forbes 400, pledged his entire fortune to charity and taxes. Buffett has been vocal about his efforts to reduce the vast wealth sitting in the hands of a few influential people.

"Dynastic wealth, the enemy of a meritocracy, is on the rise,"Buffett said in 2007. "Equality of opportunity has been on the decline. A progressive and meaningful estate tax is needed to curb the movement of a democracy toward plutocracy."

SEE ALSO: Bill Gates says the politicians proposing 70% income tax rates for the superrich are 'missing the picture'

DON'T MISS: Billionaires who hate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's 70% tax on the superrich are adamant it will hurt the economy — but history suggests otherwise

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What it's like to do your own taxes for the very first time

Viewing all 1884 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images